Under SAPEM, macrotexture is measured as MPD and converted to estimated texture depth by ETD = 0.8 × MPD + 0.2 (mm), while skid resistance uses SFC lower limits by road feature from 0.35 (dual carriageway) to 0.55 (signalised approach) (SANRAL, 2014).
| Band | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| Very Poor | Insufficient drainage texture |
| Poor | Marginal texture depth |
| Adequate | Target texture condition |
| Rough | Noise/ride trade-off — check surfacing |
MPD = 0.9 mm → ETD = 0.8 × 0.9 + 0.2 = 0.92 mm.SFC = 0.48.0.48 < 0.55 → non-compliant, flag for surface treatment.0.48 ≥ 0.35 → compliant.RoadSense derives MPD directly from laser profilometer data captured per survey segment, applies the SAPEM ETD conversion automatically, and compares any available SFC measurement against the feature-specific lower limit for that section. Results are banded on the georeferenced project map and included in TMH 18 exports alongside IRI, rutting, and other condition indicators.
ETD is calculated from MPD using the SAPEM conversion formula ETD = 0.8 × MPD + 0.2, where both values are expressed in millimetres, allowing laser-measured macrotexture to be related to the Estimated Texture Depth scale historically produced by the sand-patch test.
There is no single minimum: SAPEM sets SFC lower limits that scale with road feature and braking demand, ranging from 0.35 on a dual carriageway up to 0.55 at a signalised approach, reflecting the higher friction needed where vehicles brake, turn, or stop.
MPD, Mean Profile Depth, measures road surface macrotexture — the average depth of the peaks and valleys in the pavement surface profile as captured by a laser profiler — and is the primary input SAPEM uses to assess whether a surface has adequate texture to support wet-weather skid resistance.
For the full set of survey standards RoadSense reports against, see the standards library, or contact RoadSense to discuss a texture or skid resistance assessment for your network.